List of Open Canada Data Evidence for Use in Courts and National Inquiries
This list is being populated for use by the National Citizens' Inquiry (NCI) and in courts. It contains factual observations obtained from the officially published Government of Canada (GC) data, with references to the sources.
The evidence is presented in order of scale, with the strongest evidence presented first.
Evidence #1
Since its very first "Cases following vaccination" report, the GC has deliberately misled the public about the observed vaccine efficacy by including MANY deaths that occurred before vaccination started.
It is one of the most blatant and bold techniques of data manipulation, evident in its simplicity and obviousness, used to mislead the public.
More details:
This article also provides links to the log and the plot of all "Cases following Vaccination" statistics, with skew as reported by PHAC (comparing the number of cases counted since December 2020) and without skew (comparing the number of cases counted on a weekly basis).
It is evident that the results reported by PHAC are significantly skewed (by an order of magnitude) in favor of the fully vaccinated. The skew was most noticeable in the early stages of reporting these statistics (July-September), where instead of reporting 9%-35% of deaths among the fully vaccinated on a weekly basis, PHAC only reported 1%-4% of them.
When the skew is removed, the data shows that individuals with more doses were never "significantly protected" compared to the unvaccinated and partially vaccinated. Starting from winter 2021-2022, individuals with more doses had more, not fewer, "COVID cases" (including "deceased cases") than those with fewer doses.
Evidences #2:
WHO declared novel coronavirus disease a pandemic on March 11, 2020 (Source: https://globalnews.ca/news/6660863/who-coronavirus-pandemic/). However, it appears that the Government of Canada (GC) had knowledge in 2019, prior to the pandemic declaration, that the pandemic would indeed be announced in 2020 and that it would result in deaths of a new type, categorized as "covid-related" and "Information not available (NA)." This can be seen from the fact that in the very first StatCan death by cause report of the year 2020 (published by StatCan on January 6, 2020), the deaths dataset had already been modified to include these new types of death causes that would only be used later in 2020 and 2021.
One might question how the GC was able to anticipate the increase in "covid" deaths and "cause NA" deaths in the upcoming years, particularly considering the time it takes for the GC to plan, approve, and implement any changes in their systems. When did the GC start planning for these anticipated deaths, and who made the decision, when, and why?
Specifically, who, when, and why was the decision made in 2019 to create a new category called "Information not available," which would only be used later in 2021 and become one of the most reported categories since the start of COVID vaccination?
Evidence # 3
In Canadian history, there has never been such a significant number of deaths reported without a specified cause. The number of deaths categorized as R99 ("unspecified") also increased after the vaccination campaign began.
The category "Information not available" has become one of the most frequently reported causes of death after the start of vaccination. Prior to 2020, such an option for reporting deaths as "Information not available" did not exist in Canada. There were virtually no cases reported as NA before the vaccination campaign commenced.
Evidence #4
Until the summer of 2020, there were no reported COVID deaths in Alberta and the Eastern provinces. It was only after they agreed to adhere to the "recommendations" from Ottawa, likely in exchange for monetary support to deal with the pandemic, which were developed by the WHO, that the number of reported COVID deaths in those provinces began to increase to levels similar to Ontario and Quebec, the first provinces to adopt the WHO-recommended definitions of COVID deaths.
This demonstrates that the determination of what constitutes a "COVID" death is influenced by who defines it and how it is defined.
There were several other countries in the world that chose not to follow the WHO recommendations, and some even refused financial aid to deal with COVID. Examples of such countries are Sweden and Belarus.
In certain reports from the GC (PHAC), the term "Cases deceased" is used, clearly indicating that a person may have died from other causes but tested positive for COVID at the time of passing away.
Evidence #5 (related to #4)
When the number of reported COVID deaths increased, the number of many other causes of death decreased, including those that historically show an upward trend, such as cancer, and those that were expected to rise during the challenging times of the pandemic, such as suicides.
Evidence #6
There has been a significant increase in deaths (excess deaths) observed after vaccination, particularly among the young population, where the count of "COVID deaths" represents only a fraction of the overall increase.
More details on this:
https://sites.google.com/view/open-canada/dashboard/excess-deaths
Evidence #7:
The ratio of the "Cumulative number of serious reports" to "COVID cases deceased," which can serve as a proxy for the risk-benefit value of the vaccine, is 100 times higher for children under 18 compared to adults aged 18 and above. It is estimated to be 1,000-10,000 times higher for children under 18 compared to the elderly aged 70 and above.